KEY POINTS:
POTSDAM, Germany - Talks between four of the world's big trade powers collapsed today, throwing the future of global WTO talks on free commerce into deeper crisis.
The United States and the European Union, representing rich nation interests, and Brazil and India, for the developing world, were quick
to blame the other side for the collapse of the so-called 'G4' meeting which had been scheduled to run until tomorrow.
Diplomats and trade officials had warned it would be hard for the full 150-member state World Trade Organisation to meet an end-July target for a deal, without a preparatory agreement by the G4 group of trade powers.
But ministers insisted that despite the severe setback, the near six-year-old WTO negotiations -- seen as a bulwark against creeping protectionism -- were not yet dead.
"Potsdam, once again, was not very successful," Brazil's Foreign Minister Celso Amorim told a news conference. "It was useless to continue the discussion on the basis of the numbers put on the table."
The four were attempting to overcome deep differences over how far to open up agricultural and industrial markets and cut rich nation farm subsidies.
"It (the failure) places a very major question mark on the ability of the wider membership of the WTO to complete this round," EU Trade Commissioner Peter Mandelson told journalists. "(But) it does not in itself mean that the negotiations cannot be put back on track," he added.
WHITE HOUSE POINTS AT BRAZIL, INDIA
The White House accused Brazil and India of standing in the way of a deal that -- it said -- would help smaller countries.
"The president is disappointed that certain countries are blocking an opportunity to expand trade," spokesman Tony Fratto said. "Large economies like Brazil and India should not stand in the way of progress for smaller, poor developing nations -- but that appears to be what happened in Germany this week."
WTO boss Pascal Lamy has warned that without a breakthrough by August, the negotiations could be put on hold for several more years or even fail altogether.
Lamy quickly called a meeting of the Doha round's steering group, the Trade Negotiating Committee, for Friday afternoon in Geneva to underline that the search for an accord continues.
"I now call on the members of the G4 to contribute to the multilateral negotiating process, which will continue as of today in Geneva," he said in a statement.
Amorim and India's Commerce and Industry Minister Kamal Nath were due to fly to Geneva. US Trade Representative Susan Schwab was also considering making the trip, officials said.
Launched in the Qatari capital in late 2001, the round aims to lift millions out of poverty through more trade. But it has faced problems from the start, mainly over agriculture, which is a highly sensitive political issue almost everywhere.
ATTITUDE CHANGE
Washington has demanded that any deal that significantly cuts US farm subsidies must open new export markets around the world in agriculture, manufacturing and services.
But Brazil and India said Washington was not ready to go far enough to warrant more concessions on their part in manufacturing goods or in lowering barriers to imports of US farm goods.
"If the round is to move forward, there will have to be a substantial attitude change," said Nath.
EU officials told journalists the sort of tariff cuts being offered by Brazil would not have led to any additional business for European companies.
In a letter to Schwab and Mandelson on Wednesday, top US and European manufacturers warned they could not support a deal that did little to open developing countries to more exports.
Hopes had been running high going into the four-power talks, which began on Tuesday, after a series of meetings between senior officials had appeared to remove some obstacles.
* * *
Wellington Chamber of Commerce CEO Charles Finny today said he hopes that the failure of the Potsdam G4 Trade Ministers meeting doesn't destroy all hope of completion of the global WTO negotiation.
"It does appear that the EU and US positions are converging. That is positive.
"But let's put the focus on agriculture aside for a while and see what progress can be achieved on non-agricultural market access and the critically important area of services.
"If a good deal is possible on services this will go some way to compensate US and EU disappointment over the quality of what is on offer in the non-agricultural goods area."
- REUTERS
