The industry organisation said the problem is that while local councils build and maintain about 40 per cent of the nation's infrastructure, they only have about a tenth of the money central government has.
"As our towns and cities grow, central government enjoys the benefit of this economic growth, while councils are legally restricted to only recovering their costs.
He said council debt constraints add to the problem and restrict local authorities from investing in infrastructure.
The lobby group wants a series of partnerships between central governments and local councils including local bodies being given more government money in return for freeing up infrastructure serviced land for housing.
"Incentivising local councils with a share of the dividends from economic growth so they can invest in infrastructure to create more economic growth and free up land for housing just makes sense," he said.
The other nations covered in Demographia report were Hong Kong, Australia, Canada, Ireland, Singapore, the United Kingdom and the United States.
All eight New Zealand cities surveyed fell into the "severely unaffordable" category, which has a rating of more than 5.1.
The most unaffordable was Tauranga at 9.3 and the lowest was Christchurch at 5.4. In Auckland, the multiple was 8.6, while in Wellington it was 6.8.
Countries with better housing affordability ratings include the United States, where the median market multiple was 3.9, and Canada where it was 4.4.