By SIMON COLLINS
A Government discussion paper has proposed a "code of best practice" to ensure that biotechnology projects are "ethically and culturally appropriate".
The 50-page document also suggests setting firmer decision deadlines for proposed genetic modification projects, streamlining cases where approvals are now required from several separate authorities, and asking
the Audit Office to report at intervals on how the regulations are working.
But all its proposals are put forward only as "issues" for discussion. Submissions are invited until November 30.
The paper is the first step in developing a "biotechnology strategy", which was recommended last year by the Royal Commission on Genetic Modification.
It says New Zealand's biotech sector is "underdeveloped relative to its potential", with a regulatory system that is "perceived by some to be complex, with uncertain timeframes for approvals".
It proposes a "vision" that New Zealand "responsibly applies our world-class biological knowledge, skills, innovation and technologies to benefit the wealth, health and environment of New Zealanders, now and in the future".
It does not define a code of best practice to achieve this vision, but says that it could include:
* Agreements on ethically and culturally appropriate and inappropriate uses of biotechnology.
* Statements outlining accepted practice and regulations for research.
* Guidelines for public participation.
The chairman of the Life Sciences Network, Dr William Rolleston, said the industry group Biotenz already had a code of conduct. He was more concerned about the complex regulations which may require approvals for the same work from separate bodies governing animal health, food safety, meat and dairy products.
Further reading
nzherald.co.nz/ge
GE links
GE glossary
