Many economists and central bankers were always lukewarm on the idea, which has always seemed more politically than economically-driven. In 2007, many pointed to the apparent success of the Eurozone as a reason for such a currency union.
Again, no more.
This weekend's election in Greece is all about the catastrophic failure of a currency union to deal with differences in the structures of economies within that union.
The global financial crisis has exposed the Eurozone's inherent flaws, hidden for years by property bubbles and rampant lending by European bankers determined to leverage their way to glory (and some really big bonuses).
Now the tide has gone out, Europe's bankers and the Eurozone are exposed in all their economic nakedness.
Germany was the prime beneficiary of the Eurozone. The new currency was weaker than the Deutschmark, making German exports more competitive in the eyes of Southern European buyers.
Germany generated big trade surpluses and lent those surpluses to its neighbours to buy yet more German exports.
It's no accident that Greece and Spain are now awash with heavily devalued Porsche Cayennes and BMW X5s while Germany is struggling to get Greeks and Spaniards to repay the debts.
Now the only solution is for Germany to write enormous cheques to keep Southern Europe in the euro or take one almighty hit by forgiving the debt. The first is politically untenable. The second would wipe out Germany's banks.
Many economists now believe the cleanest and most effective option would be for Germany to return to a much stronger Mark.
This is one almighty mess caused by the formation of a single currency without common economic fundamentals or fiscal policies. An Anzac currency would be similarly flawed.