But Olo Ltd's lawyer, Ben Russell, said last week the relationship between the parties became strained and in September or October last year the caretaker of 46a advised 34 they did not have access through the larger property.
When Olo sought to sustain a caveat last week over the Hotchin-linked 46a, Russell told Justice Graham Lang his client intended to file further action against the land's owner.
Asked outside court about that action, Russell said it would be an attempt to enforce his client's "access rights".
"We want to go to the court now to seek an order for the access rights under the agreement, independent of the question of whether or not there's a caveatable interest," Russell said.
Russell said his client would be seeking damages in the action and last week told the court that being denied access had caused his client to incur additional building costs and that building work was put off until October this year.
The lawyer could give no detail on when the action would be filed but said his client was "pretty keen to push it along".
See below for a map showing the two properties in question. The large house in the middle with the tennis court is owned by KA No 3. House number 34 Matapana Road is below, with a white roof: