Telecom, in its submission to the commission on the Boost services, said Chorus proposed to significantly degrade the service performance of regulated UBA.
"Chorus now proposes to contemporaneously degrade the performance of the regulated UBA service by imposing an artificial cap on the available throughput of 250kps [kilobits per second] per line for the regulated UBA services in order to create the commercial space for the Boost products.
"This amounts to a significant degrading of the service performance of the regulated service ... ," Telecom said.
The commission said yesterday it had received external legal advice - from Queen's Counsel David Laurenson and lawyer James Every-Palmer - that the proposed changes were likely to breach terms requiring the infrastructure company to carry out obligations in good faith.
The commission said it was seeking views on this legal opinion.
Chorus said the legal advice "appears to be inconsistent with the regulatory guidance that is available".
Independently of the Spark complaint, the commission is required to assess whether the Boost services are materially different from the regulated UBA service and can be priced separately.
Telecom and Chorus split in late 2011 so the network company could take part in the Government's ultra-fast broadband scheme.