Personal threats are "often the last-ditch resort to try get journalists to dial down their intense scrutiny," said Kelly McBride, vice president at the Poynter Institute, a journalism school. "It's not uncommon, when you challenge authority, that authority fights back."
Michael said in a statement that he regretting making the remarks, which he said was "borne out of frustration during an informal debate over what I feel is sensationalistic media coverage of the company."
The executive focused in particular on reporting by Sarah Lacy, the editor of PandoDaily, a technology news website, BuzzFeed reported. Lacy had written several stories critical of Uber's business practices.
"We have not, do not and will not investigate journalists," Sarah Maxwell, a spokeswoman for San Francisco-based Uber, said in a statement. "Those remarks have no basis in the reality of our approach."
Lacy responded to Michael's comments in a column, saying the incident reflected a "morally bankrupt" culture at Uber. Lacy later updated the column to say that Michael contacted her and apologised.
BuzzFeed's article and Lacy's response, shared widely via social media, reflects the public's interest in personal narratives, according to McBride.
"The audience tends to be drawn to personal narratives, so when a reporter writes from personal experience that tends to get more of a response in social media because it's more human," McBride said.
- Bloomberg