Few on either side of the debate have questioned that strong profits, high dividends and ever-rising share prices are inevitable for the three state-owned power generators. But this is far from certain, particularly given some big changes in our power consumption habits and the risks of more to come.
The assumption is that New Zealanders' demand for electricity is insatiable and the only question is how we generate the extra money to build new power plants.
Historically, New Zealanders kept adding gadgets and heaters to their houses. Factories and farms grew and used more power-hungry machines. But that has changed. Ministry of Economic Development (MED) figures show total observed electricity consumption has fallen in three of the past four years.
MED's data, dating to 1975, records only one other annual fall, in 1992. Something is changing here. Export manufacturing operations have moved offshore and thousands of houses have been insulated.
The long recession after the Global Financial Crisis has deepened the slump in demand for power. Norske Skog is halving production at its power-hungry Kawerau pulp and paper plant because of falling global demand for newsprint. The plant generates 2.9 per cent of NZ's power demand.
Also this month, Rio Tinto's Pacific Aluminium asked Meridian Energy to renegotiate its contract to supply electricity from its Manapouri station to the Tiwai Point aluminium smelter in Bluff. Rio Tinto is grappling with weak aluminium prices globally. It may shut the smelter, freeing up 15 per cent of NZ's electricity supply.
Transpower says it could easily upgrade to feed that power into the grid. This creates the risk of a perfect storm for power generators: a surge of new supply just as demand dries up. This would put downward pressure on prices, profits and dividends.
Maybe the "sure thing" SOE floats aren't so sure after all. This is no one-way bet.