Lawyer for the residents' society, Jeremy Brabant, said the effect of construction activity on Fisher Point Drive and the access it gave to the basement parking of one apartment block was of concern.
This needed to be appropriately addressed through conditions of consent, if resource consent was granted.
But the society cannot get developer Beaumont Trading to agree to provide alternative parking nearby when the right of way is blocked by construction.
The developer is not ruling out an alternative.
Planning consultant Gary Deeney said during construction there would be times during a 10- to 12-week period when access to one apartment block's carparking was not available.
However, finding alternative parking for residents was a matter for negotiation rather than a condition of the resource consent.
Mr Brabant said the condition was reasonable and related directly to the impact of the proposed works.
Residents wanted sufficient notice of closure of Fisher Point Drive access and certainty that they could go about their business with as little disruption as possible.
The hearing was adjourned because the commissioners wanted to get updated information during the week.