Chief executives typically have a large part of what they earn tied to performance targets. Last year most of those targets will have been met.
There will always be outrage from some quarters about the seemingly exponential scale of executive salaries. But we live in a free and global market where supply and demand set the pricing for talent.
Public concerns about unfairness of salaries seldom carry over to those of the top paid sports and entertainment stars with the same degree of passion.
The point of the Herald CEO Pay Survey has never been to target individuals - though there is no doubt plenty of interest in the big names.
More relevant are the concerns of shareholders when the pay increases of chief executives aren't backed by performance. That is the reason that the disclosure requirements that come with a public listing are so important.
Read also:
• Media heads rule ranks of best-paid US CEOs
• CEO earnings 2013: See what NZ's top execs earn
Looking back over the years of this survey we can see that it does act as a barometer for the rises and falls in fortune of the business world.
In the wake of the global financial crisis New Zealand companies took a while to feel the heat. The high tide mark was our 2010 survey in which four chief executives earned more than $5 million.
Four years later and no individual is yet back at those levels.
Debate on this article is now closed.