"If you looked at this on paper and asked, does this make sense, people would laugh and say, no, it really doesn't. However, it is the reality."
In Auckland's case, about 67 per cent of imports through the port end up in distribution centres within a 20km radius of the port's gates, so having the port there makes sense from the supply chain perspective.
The only problem is: what to do with those empty containers.
To complicate matters further, there is also heavy imbalance between total imports and total exports, in volume terms. The country's import volumes are one third less than its export volumes.
And it's often the case that incoming containers - carrying the likes of plant and machinery - need to be specially cleaned to contain more sensitive products, like milk powder, on the way out.
Like all the big shipping companies, Maersk Line came under pressure in the aftermath of the global financial crisis and the environment remains difficult, Morrison said.
Maersk is no stranger to putting the squeeze on ports to improve their turnaround times, as Ports of Auckland found out in 2011 when it was ditched in favour of Tauranga, but it has since clawed back some Maersk business.
As far as the Auckland versus Tauranga import/export argument goes, Morrison said it was structural imbalance within the market in New Zealand "and one that is unlikely to change".