Specsavers wins 'should've' approval

Mark Blades, co-owner of Specsavers Optometrists, Napier. Specsavers has won the right to the word "should've". Photo / Hawke's Bay Today
Mark Blades, co-owner of Specsavers Optometrists, Napier. Specsavers has won the right to the word "should've". Photo / Hawke's Bay Today

An application by Specsavers to trademark the terms "should've" and "shouldve" to protect its advertising catchphrase has been approved.

The high street optician's application to safeguard its slogan "Should've gone to Specsavers" has been deemed valid by the UK Intellectual Property Office (IPO) and third parties now have two months to raise any objections.

The catchphrase is central to Specsavers' marketing campaigns, with adverts featuring hapless people who could have avoided embarrassing situations had they visited the optician beforehand. Trademarking a single word is unusual but has been done by companies in the past.

Carlsberg successfully registered the word "probably" in the UK after establishing the slogan "Probably the best lager in the world".

McDonald's has trademarked the phrase "I'm lovin' it" and Nestle has done the same with "Have a break" for its KitKat bars.

The IPO said applications for trademarks on common words could be made where they were linked to a company through use or association.

An IPO spokesman said: "We can confirm that the application for the trademark in question was published on August 12.

"Objections to the trademark application can be raised for a period of up to two months from the publication date."

Get the news delivered straight to your inbox

Receive the day’s news, sport and entertainment in our daily email newsletter

SIGN UP NOW

© Copyright 2016, NZME. Publishing Limited

Assembled by: (static) on production apcf04 at 11 Dec 2016 08:34:33 Processing Time: 697ms