That bill was later withdrawn and the new, strengthened Government Bill was much improved, Hoggard said.
However, Federated Farmers sought changes, including that mediators be experienced not only in mediation but also in the agricultural and rural sectors; that the cost of mediation was not a barrier to farmers taking it up; and that an enforcement certificate should not be granted to a creditor until the farmer had either formally rejected mediation, or not attended mediation in good faith.
Federated Farmers said in a statement it was clear from questions at the select committee that MPs were pondering at what point compulsory mediation should be triggered.
Read more from Federated Farmers here.
Farm receiverships and mortgagee sales were end points of farm/bank disputes and were relatively rare.
Earlier bank enforcement action such as calling up an overdraft or insisting on a significant loan principal repayment could put a farmer under intense pressure.
The Bill proposes that farmers can request mediation at any time, but a bank can decline.
Federated Farmers said it would like to see a provision that a bank could not decline mediation, unless the farmer's request was unreasonable.
Costs on farmers, including from new and impending regulations and taxes, were clearly causing some banks to wind back their interest in the agricultural sector, Hoggard said.
Farmers who had contacted him were "being shuffled around" from bank manager to manager, or just to a call centre.
For some farmers it was at the point where "they don't view the bank manager as an integral part of the team any more, just someone to dread a phone call from".