For example, planting pine trees has many negative and unintended consequences on water quality outcomes – this hasn’t been included in any of the modelling. Sitting in an office away from the land it’s easy to hypothesise and dream but surely at some stage there is a requirement to ground truth on what’s proposed, ie council reps couldn’t identify any farms within the Tararua region that are operating in a manner that fulfils the new targeted requirements.
Is the data used for modelling robust? No. There are no data collection points or collected data available for the Puketoi FMU. No data from catchment groups or individual farmers involved in the plantain project has been included.
Could Horizons have set a more achievable target? Yes.
Should sub-catchment data be available to set targets? Yes.
Should economic data and social impact reports be available to ensure informed targets are set? Yes.
What appeared lacking was a genuine desire to recognise that presenting targets without knowing the outcomes for our communities wasn’t acceptable.
On a positive note. Great to see Tararua farming leaders together speaking passionately about farming in our Tararua region. There were some excellent questions asked of the presenters and Horizons staff.
Will a united pushback see both changes in approach and timelines, I certainly hope so.