In it's appeal DoC says there is a lack of research on the aquifer and the affect on important wetlands on the Aupōuri peninsula could be severe.
Opponents' concerns fell into eight broad categories - the volume of the proposed take, its effect on existing bores, water quality, ecological issues, salt water intrusion, lack of consultation, inadequacy of assessment and monitoring, and cultural issues.
Independent commissioners David Hill (chairman) and Peter Callander, who heard the applications on behalf of the NRC, including a three-day sitting in Kaitaia in March, accepted that submitters had expressed a reasonable concern the safety and security of the aquifer, which was the sole source of groundwater for communities on the peninsula.
Based on evidence from the applicant, council experts and submitters, they were well aware that the aquifer was potentially vulnerable, "due to its connection to the sea and the variable amounts of rainfall recharge related to climatic changes and the clearing and planting of forestry blocks".
The commissioners noted that "as with many groundwater development scenarios," there was a degree of uncertainty about the magnitude of change that might occur.