"It may increase chances for sustained flow at Coes Ford, and it could potentially make the difference between very low flow and no flow. The benefit in flow could be in the order of 100 litres per second," the report said.
Legal advice to ECan focused on whether a water shortage direction would meet statutory requirements, in particular whether there was currently a serious, temporary shortage of water. The advice was that while there was a serious shortage of water, it was unclear whether the situation was temporary and this could be challenged in court.
The report said that previous consent reviews had, on average, cost ECan $1800 per consent. The figure would be expected to be lower than that if pursued for the Selwyn River catchment but would also cost the consent holders themselves money. A consent review could also be open to legal challenge.
North Canterbury Fish and Game general manager and ECan councillor Rod Cullinane said the recommended option was only fiddling with the issue rather than addressing the root cause - but the other two options were no better.
"The horse has well and truly bolted on this one, the region is severely over-allocated," Mr Cullinane said.
"In the long term the solution has to be a reduction in the amount of abstraction, and how that is done is a challenge."
ECan has said consecutive drought years is the major cause of low flows in the river, with irrigation a contributing factor.