"We support sustainable, responsible conservation that benefits local communities and respects our environment, including all creatures great and small."
Meanwhile a reply to an Official Information Act request from Locals for Responsible Conservation, received in March, raised more questions, glossed over the risks and showed that DOC had misled the public about the cost of the operations and local support for the drop, the group said.
A number of the groups listed as having been consulted said they had not been, while others had wrongly been cited as supportive.
Tai Tokerau District Maori Council chairman Rihari Dargaville said the planned drop was a "travesty of ignorance" and a breach of Treaty protocols in that hapu had not been consulted over the intention to use 1080 in Russell State Forest, at Totara North, Whangaroa and Puketi.
DOC may have consulted some Maori groups or individuals, but they do not hold authority over these areas — hapu do," Mr Dargaville said.
"Hapu vehemently oppose DOC's intention to drop 1080 in these areas, or on any area that hapu have rangatira rights over. They have gone as far as to say they want 1080 banned."
Di Maxwell, who chairs the Far North Resilient Communities Charitable Trust, said her organisation was working on a business plan showing that there was an alternative to 1080. By focusing on sustainable pest control, social enterprises could be developed that would provide employment opportunities, she said.