D'Esposito knew the supplier was not a licensed trader and six of the transactions took place after the September 2014 bust, D'Esposito carrying-on despite knowledge of the investigation taking place. Across the transactions continuing past mid-2015, D'Esposito paid $9180 for 457kg of minced paua, worth over $24,000 in the wholesale market.
One of the transactions took place within three weeks of the raid, despite D'Esposito having told the seller they should stop "until things go back to normal".
On September 1, 2015, the officer bought 1kg of frozen paua from the company's shop, received in a bag able to be identified as having been sold to D'Esposito in one of the transactions.
The next day more raids netted 1.8 tonnes of paua and 600 crayfish alleged to be linked to illegal fish supply, and as part of the inquiry officers seized control over a commercial fishing boat, three recreational vessels, and a dozen vehicles, including a tractor. Judge Hinton agreed with Crown prosecutor Steve Manning that it was "flagrant" disregard for the sustainability of the fish supply, the fisheries management system and the law.
D'Esposito clearly knew it was illegal, he said.
Manning believed the Crown was being fair in assessing two-and-a-half years' jail as a starting point for calculation of the sentence after considering aggravating factors, such as D'Esposito's history of fisheries breaches, and discounting for such factors as the guilty plea. But he said the Crown's standard could have been higher.
Defence counsel Paul Wicks QC suggested a starting point of 12 months' jail and an end-result of community detention, which the Judge rejected, saying the offences were too serious.
Judge Hinton was able to consider a home detention outcome when the potential prison sentence was calculated at 23 months, one month inside a threshold enabling judges to consider the home detention option.