The Country
  • The Country home
  • Latest news
  • Audio & podcasts
  • Opinion
  • Dairy farming
  • Sheep & beef farming
  • Rural business
  • Rural technology
  • Rural life
  • Listen on iHeart radio

Subscriptions

  • Herald Premium
  • Viva Premium
  • The Listener
  • BusinessDesk

Sections

  • Latest news
  • Coast & Country News
  • Opinion
  • Dairy farming
  • Sheep & beef farming
  • Horticulture
  • Animal health
  • Rural business
  • Rural technology
  • Rural life

Media

  • Podcasts
  • Video

Weather

  • Kaitaia
  • Whāngarei
  • Dargaville
  • Auckland
  • Thames
  • Tauranga
  • Hamilton
  • Whakatāne
  • Rotorua
  • Tokoroa
  • Te Kuiti
  • Taumurunui
  • Taupō
  • Gisborne
  • New Plymouth
  • Napier
  • Hastings
  • Dannevirke
  • Whanganui
  • Palmerston North
  • Levin
  • Paraparaumu
  • Masterton
  • Wellington
  • Motueka
  • Nelson
  • Blenheim
  • Westport
  • Reefton
  • Kaikōura
  • Greymouth
  • Hokitika
  • Christchurch
  • Ashburton
  • Timaru
  • Wānaka
  • Oamaru
  • Queenstown
  • Dunedin
  • Gore
  • Invercargill

NZME Network

  • Advertise with NZME
  • OneRoof
  • Driven Car Guide
  • BusinessDesk
  • Newstalk ZB
  • Sunlive
  • ZM
  • The Hits
  • Coast
  • Radio Hauraki
  • The Alternative Commentary Collective
  • Gold
  • Flava
  • iHeart Radio
  • Hokonui
  • Radio Wanaka
  • iHeartCountry New Zealand
  • Restaurant Hub
  • NZME Events

SubscribeSign In
Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.
Home / The Country

Government in race against time to price farm emissions by 2025

Thomas Coughlan
By Thomas Coughlan
Political Editor·NZ Herald·
7 Jun, 2022 09:30 PM7 mins to read

Subscribe to listen

Access to Herald Premium articles require a Premium subscription. Subscribe now to listen.
Already a subscriber?  Sign in here

Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech.
‌
Save

    Share this article

A key working group has said farmers should pay a portion of the price of their emissions by 2025. Photo / Lynda Feringa

A key working group has said farmers should pay a portion of the price of their emissions by 2025. Photo / Lynda Feringa

Individual farmers would be responsible for paying the price of their greenhouse gas emissions when emissions pricing is rolled out from 2025 if the recommendations from a sector working group are accepted by the Government.

However, there are concerns that the computer system used to calculate emissions liabilities might not be ready by that date.

Individual farmers would be responsible for calculating their own emissions and paying a levy on those emissions. The calculations would be based on a "split-gas" model, which would take into account the differing heating impacts of long and short-lived gases, like methane and carbon dioxide. Farmers would also give an "incentive discount" for actions farmers take to reduce emissions.

Farmers would also be able to factor in the efforts at carbon sequestration they make, like planting trees on their properties.

Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.
Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

After calculating their emissions and sequestration, farmers would then pay the net cost of those emissions through a levy. This would begin in 2025, although farms would have to calculate and report emissions in 2024. There are still questions over what that levy would be and the extent to which it represents the true environmental cost of those emissions.

The group modelled the impacts of the charges on farm profitability, finding the average impact to a farm's profitability would be zero to 7.2 per cent. The group reckoned the scheme would reduce methane emissions by 4-5.5 per cent by 2030 and nitrous oxide emissions by 2.9-3.2 per cent by 2030.

The recommendations come from He Waka Eke Noa, the partnership set up between the Government and agriculture sector groups like DairyNZ and Federated Farmers.

The partnership was set up to create a form of emissions pricing both the Government and the agriculture sector would be happy with. Agriculture has been left out of the Emissions Trading Scheme despite accounting for nearly half of New Zealand's greenhouse gas emissions.

Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

If a form of suitable emissions pricing is not agreed, agriculture will enter the ETS in 2025.

Tensions over emissions pricing have existed between the Government and the sector since the 2000s. Even now, the breakaway agricultural group Groundswell has been fiercely critical of sector groups' co-operation in the He Waka Eke Noa process.

The Government is likely to make a decision on whether to accept the recommendations by the end of the year. The Climate Change Commission will also give its view on whether the scheme will do enough.

The price of farm emissions is also likely to face a form of discount so farmers would not pay the full cost of their emissions - many trade-exposed businesses do not pay their full emissions cost and instead pay a discounted cost to ensure they remain internationally competitive.

The agricultural sector wants a say in the price it pays for emissions under the levy. It wants representation on a System Oversight Board which will work with an Independent Māori Board to provide recommendations on levy rates and prices, and set the strategy for use of levy revenue.

No prices have yet been set, but He Waka Eke Noa recommended the levy rate for long-lived emissions to be set at the level required to fund sequestration recognised in the system, fund incentive discounts, cover research and development for nitrous oxide reduction, and cover a share of administration costs.

This would change after 2028, when the price would"be set based on the cost of reductions and offsetting required to achieve any sector strategy on reducing long-lived gas emissions".

The group wanted a price ceiling where the levy rate for each type of gas was "no more than if agriculture entered the NZ ETS with 95 per cent free allocation phasing down by 1
percentage point per annum and the maximum price for methane is no greater than
0.11/kg for the first three years of pricing".

This would mean that agriculture would initially pay 5 per cent of the cost of ETS equivalent emissions.

In Labour's first term, it agreed with NZ First that this would be a 95 per cent discount, meaning farmers would only pay 5 per cent of their emissions cost. This has been rejected for long-term gases in favour of a bespoke price.

Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

He Waka Eke Noa has recommended setting a unique emissions price for both methane and long-lived gases like carbon dioxide.

The Government is not due to make a decision on what form of pricing it will use until December.

There are some fish hooks. Calculations will use a "centralised calculator" but there are fears that the Government might not be able to build an IT system that can manage individual calculations for over 20,000 farms.

However, He Waka Eke Noa said that already "over 60 per cent of farms know their on-farm emissions numbers" and the sector will be ready by 2025.

The system will be phased in and some exceptionally small farms would be left out altogether.

Initially, a "simplified sequestration" calculation will work out sequestration numbers.

Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

Other sequestration efforts that fall out of this calculation will be backdated once "full sequestration measurement and recognition is in place from 2027".

He Waka Eke Noa said farmers consulted for the project expressed a "strong preference for a farm-level pricing system to give farmers control and autonomy over their farm business and emissions profile and recognition for their actions on-farm".

Pricing emissions at the processor level had been discussed as one form of emissions pricing, although pricing at the farm level has been preferred since the Interim Climate Change Committee looked at the issue in 2019.

There had been the suggestion that a transitional model would be used while computer systems were readied for farm-level pricing.

He Waka Eke Noa said that going straight into farm-level pricing "will be challenging to achieve but is preferable to switching systems after a few years".

Farmers consulted also supported the split-gas model.

Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

"Farmers supported split-gas pricing, the investment of revenue into research and development and the recognition of sequestration from on-farm vegetation, especially types not recognised in the NZ ETS," the partnership said.

The report warned some farmers might exit the business.

He Waka Eke Noa believed its recommendations would see "deer, sheep and beef operations... face a greater impact on their bottom line than dairy operations under the same levy rates".

The report noted that for sheep and beef farming, the largest emissions reductions were still coming from existing policies, mainly the conversion of agricultural land into forestry, driven by a high ETS price.

Research from Beef + Lamb presented in the report warmed that "at the extreme" this could see a "significant number of farms exiting meat production".

The report also warned that some farms could reduce production, which would see "emissions leakage" as other countries with more emissions intensive farmers ramped up production to fill the deficit left by New Zealand farms.

Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

"Current modelling estimates that a farm-level split-gas levy will result in a fall in production of milk of 1.4 per cent and meat of 0.1 per cent," the report said.

Save

    Share this article

Latest from The Country

The Country

Tonnes of promise: Angus Bull Week set to make millions

20 Jun 12:00 AM
Premium
The Country

50 years on the ice: How an Olympic gold medal kickstarted a couple's business

19 Jun 11:00 PM
The Country

Why a 'cute' pet is now included in a pest management plan

19 Jun 10:00 PM

Jono and Ben brew up a tea-fuelled adventure in Sri Lanka

sponsored
Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

Latest from The Country

Tonnes of promise: Angus Bull Week set to make millions

Tonnes of promise: Angus Bull Week set to make millions

20 Jun 12:00 AM

Black beauties offer 'soundness, type and grunt' for buyers at four days of sales.

Premium
50 years on the ice: How an Olympic gold medal kickstarted a couple's business

50 years on the ice: How an Olympic gold medal kickstarted a couple's business

19 Jun 11:00 PM
Why a 'cute' pet is now included in a pest management plan

Why a 'cute' pet is now included in a pest management plan

19 Jun 10:00 PM
How traditional Māori farming methods boost modern agriculture

How traditional Māori farming methods boost modern agriculture

19 Jun 05:01 PM
Help for those helping hardest-hit
sponsored

Help for those helping hardest-hit

NZ Herald
  • About NZ Herald
  • Meet the journalists
  • Newsletters
  • Classifieds
  • Help & support
  • Contact us
  • House rules
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Competition terms & conditions
  • Our use of AI
Subscriber Services
  • NZ Herald e-editions
  • Daily puzzles & quizzes
  • Manage your digital subscription
  • Manage your print subscription
  • Subscribe to the NZ Herald newspaper
  • Subscribe to Herald Premium
  • Gift a subscription
  • Subscriber FAQs
  • Subscription terms & conditions
  • Promotions and subscriber benefits
NZME Network
  • The New Zealand Herald
  • The Northland Age
  • The Northern Advocate
  • Waikato Herald
  • Bay of Plenty Times
  • Rotorua Daily Post
  • Hawke's Bay Today
  • Whanganui Chronicle
  • Viva
  • NZ Listener
  • Newstalk ZB
  • BusinessDesk
  • OneRoof
  • Driven Car Guide
  • iHeart Radio
  • Restaurant Hub
NZME
  • About NZME
  • NZME careers
  • Advertise with NZME
  • Digital self-service advertising
  • Book your classified ad
  • Photo sales
  • NZME Events
  • © Copyright 2025 NZME Publishing Limited
TOP