The farmers claimed Fonterra’s milk payout was based on meeting or exceeding those of competitor, Murray Goulburn, rather than in line with their supply contracts.
Murray Goulburn cut its forecast price by as much as 15 per cent and shortly afterwards Fonterra moved to cut its payout by nearly as much.
The farmers alleged the way Fonterra communicated the price change amounted to misleading and deceptive conduct, and that it had acted unconscionably causing significant financial difficulty and distress.
Fonterra had always denied the allegations, which it said would be vigorously defended, but had been in mediation with the claimants ahead of the scheduled November 15 hearing date.
The claim was financed by a specialist litigation funding company.
- RNZ