Fonterra went public with the contamination announcement on August 3.
Had he been informed of the problem in June, Spierings said he might have made the call to "sideline" consumer products that were at risk of contamination until further testing was completed.
Affected products, including infant formula, were not recalled until August.
"The red flag should have gone up faster," Spierings said.
Last week it was finally revealed that the WPC80 was contaminated with clostridium sporogenes, which does not present a food safety risk.
Meanwhile, Fonterra yesterday announced it had completed its operational review of the botulism scare, which found reprocessing of the WPC80 after plastic was found in product led to the contamination.
"An item of non-standard equipment [a since decommissioned transfer pipe used during the reprocessing] caused the contamination," said Fonterra strategy director Maury Leyland.
Spierings said the plastic had entered the whey protein as a result of human error.
"It just dropped in," he said.
Fonterra said the decision to reprocess the original whey protein produced at Hautapu, rather than "downgrade" the product - in combination with the use of the item of non-standard equipment - resulted in the contamination.
A lapse in information sharing between two parts of the co-operative also led to delays in testing, the company added.
Spierings said Fonterra now needed to focus on becoming "best in class" in terms of food safety.
"The [dairy] season is kicking in and we need to get into action mode."
Spierings said Fonterra was implementing improvements in its business, and a new role of group director of food safety and quality had already been created.
Food & Grocery Council chief executive Katherine Rich welcomed the operational review, which she said had been thorough and asked the tough questions about how and why the recall occurred.