In talking to the petition Di Vesty said the park was highly valued by the whole community, it was not just a few people being Nimbys (Not in my back yard).
"This is a big community issue - just months ago 5000 people became sick from drinking contaminated water and because of the haste to come up with a solution Havelock North people are being punished again by losing one of its peaceful green spaces."
She said consultation on the pump station location had been poor and the community had not been asked for its opinion.
"I understand you want to remedy the water issues but the cheapest, fastest fix is not always the best solution.
"It's a piece of land under the care of the council but it's owned by all of us - if it's lost now, it's lost forever. At a time when the regional council is asking people to plant five trees a year each to increase biodiversity it's unbelievable this community is having to fight for this reserve."
In a report to yesterday's meeting, council staff outlined the impacts of both sites, including the financial implications.
Their preliminary assessment found a pump station beside the fire station would cost about $1.7 million more than the other site, mainly because the land would have to be bought.
This equated to about a $4 per household targeted rates increase across the district.
The confirmed figures were not available yesterday and councillors agreed to defer a decision until a final purchase price for the 15 Karanema Drive site had been negotiated.
After the meeting Te Mata Rd resident Graeme Putt said he was pleased the council was taking the time to seriously consider the alternative site.
"We can't ask them to agree to something until the full costings have been done - at this stage we are feeling positive."
Fellow resident Barry Jones said if the fire station site was rejected by council, residents would not "roll over" without a fight.