The Country
  • The Country home
  • Latest news
  • Audio & podcasts
  • Opinion
  • Dairy farming
  • Sheep & beef farming
  • Rural business
  • Rural technology
  • Rural life
  • Listen on iHeart radio

Subscriptions

  • Herald Premium
  • Viva Premium
  • The Listener
  • BusinessDesk

Sections

  • Latest news
  • Coast & Country News
  • Opinion
  • Dairy farming
  • Sheep & beef farming
  • Horticulture
  • Animal health
  • Rural business
  • Rural technology
  • Rural life

Media

  • Podcasts
  • Video

Weather

  • Kaitaia
  • Whāngarei
  • Dargaville
  • Auckland
  • Thames
  • Tauranga
  • Hamilton
  • Whakatāne
  • Rotorua
  • Tokoroa
  • Te Kuiti
  • Taumurunui
  • Taupō
  • Gisborne
  • New Plymouth
  • Napier
  • Hastings
  • Dannevirke
  • Whanganui
  • Palmerston North
  • Levin
  • Paraparaumu
  • Masterton
  • Wellington
  • Motueka
  • Nelson
  • Blenheim
  • Westport
  • Reefton
  • Kaikōura
  • Greymouth
  • Hokitika
  • Christchurch
  • Ashburton
  • Timaru
  • Wānaka
  • Oamaru
  • Queenstown
  • Dunedin
  • Gore
  • Invercargill

NZME Network

  • Advertise with NZME
  • OneRoof
  • Driven Car Guide
  • BusinessDesk
  • Newstalk ZB
  • Sunlive
  • ZM
  • The Hits
  • Coast
  • Radio Hauraki
  • The Alternative Commentary Collective
  • Gold
  • Flava
  • iHeart Radio
  • Hokonui
  • Radio Wanaka
  • iHeartCountry New Zealand
  • Restaurant Hub
  • NZME Events

SubscribeSign In
Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.
Home / The Country

Brian Fallow: Fighting climate change on the farm

Brian Fallow
By Brian Fallow
Columnist·NZ Herald·
6 Sep, 2018 12:00 AM6 mins to read

Subscribe to listen

Access to Herald Premium articles require a Premium subscription. Subscribe now to listen.
Already a subscriber?  Sign in here

Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech.
‌
Save

    Share this article

Methane from livestock accounts for 44 per cent of NZ's climate-change emissions. Photo / NZME file

Methane from livestock accounts for 44 per cent of NZ's climate-change emissions. Photo / NZME file

COMMENT: Nobody enjoys having to pay for something that has always been free.

But often, it is the only way to avoid a tragedy of the commons.

So we have a quota management system intended to avert the collapse of fisheries, and more recently carbon pricing — albeit still at a gentle level — mitigating the right to emit greenhouse gases from the combustion of fossil fuels.

The same treatment is now in prospect for the methane belched by cattle and sheep, which represents around 44 per cent of national emissions.

But the good news for pastoral farmers is that the domestic regime that emerges is likely to recognise — as international carbon accounting rules do not — the difference between long-lived gases like carbon dioxide or nitrous oxide and a relatively short-lived gas like methane.

Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.
Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

Three possible ways of defining the statutory objective of net zero emissions by 2050 are offered in the Government's consultation document for its proposed Zero Carbon Bill. The one that looks to have the best chance of garnering crucial cross-party support is "Net zero emissions of long-lived gases (mainly CO2 and nitrous oxide) by 2050 and stabilised flows of the short-lived gas, methane." It does not indicate at what level the flow of methane would be stabilised.

But policymakers might be guided on that rather essential point by a note put out last week by the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment, Simon Upton, which outlines the scientific case for treating methane differently.

Does that mean it is good enough just to stabilise the flow [of methane] at current levels? Sorry, no.

The long-lived gases accumulate, so if you want to stabilise the atmospheric concentration, you have to reduce the net flow of those gases into the atmosphere to zero.

But for methane, Mother Nature cleans up after us, breaking it down to CO2 and water at the rate of two-thirds every 12 years.

Read more:
• Cut carbon emissions? Yes we can
• Climate warms towards Govt's plan to cut carbon
• Property values at risk as climate changes

Discover more

Opinion

Hosking: Stupid climate solutions - people don't want to bike to work

05 Sep 06:58 PM

Does that mean it is good enough just to stabilise the flow at current levels? Sorry, no.

"First, if New Zealand's emissions of livestock methane were held steady at 2016 levels, then within about 10 years the amount of methane in the atmosphere from that source would level off," says Upton. "However, the warming effect of that methane would continue to increase, at a gradually declining rate, for more than a century.

Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

"Secondly, if New Zealand wished to ensure that methane from livestock caused no additional contribution to warming beyond the current level, emissions would need to be reduced by at least 10 to 22 per cent below 2016 levels by 2050."

The 22 per cent cut by 2050 reflects a scenario in which other countries take strong action and meet the Paris Agreement goals. The 10 per cent level reflects a scenario in which other countries take some action but not enough to achieve the Paris goals.

Throttling back methane emissions to that sort of range looks like the sort of reduction that could be achieved through land use change: more forests on marginal erosion-prone land, more horticulture and cropping in better country.

The Productivity Commission, in its final report on the transition to a low-emission economy, released this week, is clear that it will require land use to change substantially.
Modelling it commissioned suggests that land planted in forests will need to increase by between 1.3 million and 2.8 million hectares over the next three decades, mostly converted from marginally profitable beef and sheep farms.

"Overall, the needed rate of land-use change is comparable to the rate at which, over the last 30 years, beef and sheep farms have converted to forestry, dairying and other uses. However, the nature of change needed is quite different. In particular, the average rate of forest planting New Zealand needs to sustain over the next 30 years is comparable to its highest ever planting rate in a single year."

Then there is the question of how to transmit the necessary price signal to landowners.

Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

The commission counsels against including methane in the existing emissions trading scheme (ETS). That would involve a fixed exchange rate between methane and CO2, so that for every tonne of liable methane emissions, 25 New Zealand units would have to be bought and surrendered. It does, however, favour treating nitrous oxide that way.

Instead, it suggests either a separate parallel ETS for methane with its own cap and its own units (which could not be traded for normal NZUs) and therefore its own prices.

An alternative would be a methane quota system modelled on fishing quota. Under that model, an emitter would have to own individual transferable quota to emit "biogenic" methane up to a specified limit per period, not defined as an absolute tonnage, but as a proportion of the total allowable methane (TAM) for the year. The TAM level is set to achieve the relevant emissions budget for short-lived gases.

The commission recommends that the Interim Climate Change Committee should assess both a dual-cap ETS and a methane quota system in its report to the Government on recommended policy for agricultural greenhouse gas mitigation. That report is due by the end of April next year.

Both options — a dual ETS or methane quota — are variants on the cap-and-trade model, with medium-term emission budgets or caps set by the Government on the advice of the proposed independent and expert Climate Change Commission.

The Productivity Commission says the legislation must be clear about what consideration should guide the setting of medium-term emission budgets for methane.

Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

They should include considering the relative cost of reducing methane versus CO2, what social and economic consequences are acceptable, and an assessment of what New Zealand's fair share of global methane emissions is.

So some tricky value judgments lurk there. It implies that the idea of "depoliticising" climate policy in the future would be difficult if not impossible.

Save

    Share this article

Latest from The Country

Premium
The Country

'Dark horse' emerges: Meiji named as potential bidder for Fonterra's Mainland

17 Jun 05:16 AM
The Country

Finding forever home for old farming dogs getting harder - charity

17 Jun 04:41 AM
The Country

A nod to back-country culture: Gisborne author gains book recognition

17 Jun 04:00 AM

Jono and Ben brew up a tea-fuelled adventure in Sri Lanka

sponsored
Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

Latest from The Country

Premium
'Dark horse' emerges: Meiji named as potential bidder for Fonterra's Mainland

'Dark horse' emerges: Meiji named as potential bidder for Fonterra's Mainland

17 Jun 05:16 AM

Japanese food group Meiji is listed on the Nikkei 225.

Finding forever home for old farming dogs getting harder - charity

Finding forever home for old farming dogs getting harder - charity

17 Jun 04:41 AM
A nod to back-country culture: Gisborne author gains book recognition

A nod to back-country culture: Gisborne author gains book recognition

17 Jun 04:00 AM
On The Up: Pie-fecta - Pie King's trainees claim top prizes in apprentice showdown

On The Up: Pie-fecta - Pie King's trainees claim top prizes in apprentice showdown

17 Jun 03:00 AM
Help for those helping hardest-hit
sponsored

Help for those helping hardest-hit

NZ Herald
  • About NZ Herald
  • Meet the journalists
  • Newsletters
  • Classifieds
  • Help & support
  • Contact us
  • House rules
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Competition terms & conditions
  • Our use of AI
Subscriber Services
  • NZ Herald e-editions
  • Daily puzzles & quizzes
  • Manage your digital subscription
  • Manage your print subscription
  • Subscribe to the NZ Herald newspaper
  • Subscribe to Herald Premium
  • Gift a subscription
  • Subscriber FAQs
  • Subscription terms & conditions
  • Promotions and subscriber benefits
NZME Network
  • The New Zealand Herald
  • The Northland Age
  • The Northern Advocate
  • Waikato Herald
  • Bay of Plenty Times
  • Rotorua Daily Post
  • Hawke's Bay Today
  • Whanganui Chronicle
  • Viva
  • NZ Listener
  • Newstalk ZB
  • BusinessDesk
  • OneRoof
  • Driven Car Guide
  • iHeart Radio
  • Restaurant Hub
NZME
  • About NZME
  • NZME careers
  • Advertise with NZME
  • Digital self-service advertising
  • Book your classified ad
  • Photo sales
  • NZME Events
  • © Copyright 2025 NZME Publishing Limited
TOP