Have your say by going to bayofplentytimes.co.nz or dailypost.co.nz and becoming a Premium subscriber.
The price of fertiliser has gone up because of a number of reasons and [has] absolutely nothing to do with the present government. Fertiliser has always been a bone of contention for farmers and a large cost.
- Robert M
In reply to Robert M:
Suggest you google 'non-tradeable inflation rate', which is a good proxy for cost increases resultant from government policies and domestic conditions. The last time I looked it was around 8 per cent.
- Greg M
In reply to Robert M:
The cost of living did not help farmers. Tax off petrol and road user charges reduced, but burning 2000 litres of diesel a day on harvesting equipment and tractors, no help at all. Add the GHG charges, yes we already pay some via our industry, and then shutting local gas production for homegrown nitrogen. Yep, it all sounds like Russia's fault.
- Garry R
It is an absolute disgrace how this Labour government have treated our farmers. Perhaps in the upcoming election, many of the rural women who voted Labour may like to reflect on how that has worked out for them and their husbands?
- Justin L
In reply to Justin L:
I certainly hope so, but there were many male farmers who thought they were giving more power to Labour by increasing the vote so that the Greens would be weakened. Some hope, as we all now know.
- Janet H
Scrap the ETS now, would remove costs throughout the economy, reduce inflation, help our exports and hopefully prevent us from starving.
Destroying Kiwi farmers and families over climate change when New Zealand is responsible for a fraction of 1 per cent of global emissions, and the major polluters like China are increasing their emissions, is both delusional and irresponsible.
- Jonathan S
In reply to Jonathan S:
Exactly. Virtue signaling of the highest order. The powers that be believe their own hype about the so called climate emergency. It's nothing of the sort.
- Mark C
Of course, the government will probably just add more costs.
Mind you, compared to a UK or EU farmer, ours still have a lot less imposition to deal with.
Stubble burning in the EU was outlawed in 1990 and application of nitrogen within 50 metres of any ditch, stream, watercourse or river was made illegal at the same time.
Also, there is vastly more public access to farmland and forestry land in both the UK and Europe than there is here.
- Marcus A
- Republished comments may be edited at the editor's discretion.
The Rotorua Daily Post and the Bay of Plenty Times welcome letters from readers. Please note the following:
• Letters should not exceed 200 words.
• They should be opinion based on facts or current events.
• If possible, please email.
• No noms-de-plume.
• Letters will be published with names and suburb/city.
• Please include full name, address and contact details for our records only.
• Local letter writers given preference.
• Rejected letters are not normally acknowledged.
• Letters may be edited, abridged, or rejected at the Editor's discretion.
• The Editor's decision on publication is final. No correspondence will be entered into.
Email editor@dailypost.co.nz or bayofplentytimes.co.nz
