So this court case really reflects the lack of resourcing given to education in New Zealand. I think it's a good argument for a court because it will be a landmark case, and if the court does decide the school must take the boy back, that could draw heat on the Government if the court also notes the inability of schools to resource for difficult students under their current funding.
It's an opportunity for a judge to comment, for the record, on what the Government is failing to do.
I've tended to think IHC has unrealistic goals for students with mental health conditions, but they have their agenda and I can't blame them for pursuing it.
But, on the basis of human rights versus the needs of the majority to have a good learning environment, that will be interesting. If the school says: "We can't handle this student," the court will ask why. Hopefully the school will say, "This is what we have in place, this is the money for resources. It's not enough to handle this situation."
The court may force the issue, but I hope it will make a societal comment. Nothing is more worthwhile than educating our children - all of them.
Andrew Bonallack is editor of the Wairarapa Times-Age.