Editorial: Dress code should be for all in court

The topic of dress codes in court has been raised after a reporter was removed from a murder trial for wearing sequinned pants.

Her gold sparkly pants seemed to have been deemed inappropriate for the Scott Guy trial at the High Court at Wellington.

As a reporter who has covered court many times in my 11-year career, I think it is important to have a decent standard of dress while at court - but not just from the media.

Most lawyers are well-groomed, as are other staff but it's not uncommon to see those appearing in court or their supporters, wearing all sorts of inappropriate clothing - and I'd say these items of clothing, which have included pyjama bottoms, are worse than glitzed up tights.

It is probably important to address the issue of fashion and how it has changed.

Office-wear is no longer a pant or skirt suit for a woman.

We have the obvious blouse and slacks but office-wear today includes shorts and blazers, flowy skirts of all lengths and dresses.

Courtroom dress has sparked debate in our newsroom in the past too. What I feel is fashionably appropriate for a courtroom, hasn't always been supported by everyone but I think as long as you're not showing a lot of skin and you're tidy, it should be okay.

There is no official dress code for media or spectators but as a guideline the Ministry of Justice website suggests women should wear a dress or skirt and blouse or a blouse and long pants.

Jeans are acceptable.

In the past I have been asked to make sure I am wearing a jacket over a long-sleeved top but I think if there is a dress code, everyone who attends whether they're working or appearing or supporting, should follow it.