The department's role in the Ruataniwha Dam argument has been equally strange.
What has happened to this former last-ditch watchdog for the New Zealand environment? Has it been restructured one too many times? Lost too many staff?
Is it underfunded by a National-led government with scant interest in the environment? Or has it been told to keep its head down?
Hilariously, since tourism topped dairy as the country's biggest earner, Government's pro-development agenda appears to be in conflict with its indifference to conservation. The conservation estate is now worth protecting - to a degree - because it earns dollars.
So conservation got a budget increase in May. But, also predictably, the biggest dollop of that was for improving visitor facilities rather than protecting endangered species.
Will there be anything left for DOC to fulfil its advocacy role?
Taxpayers expect DOC to protect our environment. When it doesn't we have to make donations to groups like Forest and Bird, who will do the job.
DOC's default leaves an information and advocacy gap, now often filled by unpaid people.
During the seabed mining hearings groups like the South Taranaki Reef Life Project, fishing clubs and private individuals put in hundreds of unpaid hours to fill this gap.