It comes as Labour calls for a full investigation into how the original complaint was seemingly moved into spam folders after it had beenread by recipients, including Opposition politicians.
When the Herald approached Bayly outside the Grand Millennium Hotel in Auckland after he spoke at a conference, he said he wasn’t drunk and said he had “no comment” when asked why he made the remarks.
“I’ve made many comments, so I’ve got nothing further to comment.”
He also refused to answer when asked if this was the last chance at keeping his job.
It claimed Bayly, who holds several ministerial portfolios, hassled the man for working late, telling him to “take some wine ... and f*** off” and repetitively calling the man a “loser”.
The complainant also alleged Bayly seemed as if he’d been drinking. He said the interaction left him feeling “degraded, embarrassed and deeply disrespected”. Bayly denied he was drunk and also didn’t recall swearing.
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon told Newstalk ZB’s Mike Hosking this morning these were “the standards” he expected from his minister.
“He thought he was making some light-hearted comments and banter and he clearly got it very, very wrong and unintentionally made someone feel very hurt and insulted. He’s apologised and ensured that behaviour won’t happen again.”
Luxon claimed Bayly did not know the person he was speaking to.
“He caused hurt and insult, he’s acknowledged that he’s apologised, he’s genuine.”
Luxon said Bayly had offered to meet the man he swore at to apologise in person.
Fronting his post-Cabinet press conference yesterday, Luxon reiterated how Bayly had apologised “as fulsomely as he possibly can” and was “mortified” by the offence taken.
While the incident happened this month, Luxon wasn’t made aware of it until Thursday. Luxon claimed that was because Bayly had thought the matter was resolved after he twice wrote to the complainant to apologise.
However, the complainant proceeded to email his concerns to several recipients last week, including Opposition MPs, prompting Luxon to act.
It was understood those in Labour who received the complainant’s email read it, but later found it had somehow been marked as spam.
Asked about this, Luxon said it was the first time he’d heard about it. He maintained his staff wouldn’t have been involved and promised to look into it.
