Likewise the onerous task (I jest) of (with others) helping a friend with the birthday Methuselah of champagne - a 6.0-litre bottle, named after the Bible's oldest person at, allegedly, 969 years - she was given by a younger brother doubtlessly implying a cheeky reference to her advanced age.
Apparently Methuselah (Noah's grandfather) was so virtuous that when he died, just as the eponymous ark was completed, God postponed the flood for seven days in mourning.
Why this might qualify his name to grace a large champagne bottle is unclear.
At the popping, however, we were more concerned with the technicalities of chilling and pouring such an enormous container. Happily, it went with a bang in fine style without a drop wasted.
Even larger bottles are named for Mordechai, a cousin of the Queen of Persia (9 litres); Balthazar, one of the Three Wise Men (12 litres): Nebuchadnezzar, King of Babylon (15 litres); and the whopping Melchizedek, High Priest of Israel at 30 litres, which could well have proved trickier to handle.
Strangely, Noah does not appear in the arcane canon of champagne-bottle nomenclature, despite being known as the Biblical father of viticulture who, post-deluge, planted vines. He too, according to Genesis, enjoyed the extreme longevity seemingly common in those ante-diluvian times, not even begetting his three sons until aged 500!
Opinion is divided about how these unbelievable lifespan figures arose. One theory is water-vapour covered the Earth before the flood circa 4990BC, filtering the ageing effect of solar radiation. Others reckon the numbers are either pure fiction or a mistranslation of a term meaning a tenth of a year, which would make Methuselah a far more credible 96.9. The final theory is superior diet, although consisting of what is not clear. Genesis is more whakapapa than lifestyle/recipe book.
Mind you, life is not a numbers game - more about quality than quantity - so I've never understood the contemporary health sector fixation on longevity, which seems to conflict directly with the current economic sector contention that we cannot afford old people.
Whatever the answers, in the meantime, let us raise our glasses, give thanks, and toast the Rumpole of the Bailey dictum that there is no pleasure on Earth worth giving up for another five years in the sunset rest-home.