But the one thing that needs to change more than ever — the economy — is crying out for politicians who know how to support those businesses that are capable of restoring this nation to the world leadership status we have previously enjoyed.
And here’s the thing.
Most general elections fail to present options that have the capacity to accommodate the varied personal choices in sufficient numbers that would result in the election of a workable government. That is why, under the MMP system we have adopted, governments are almost always a minority formed by inclusion of otherwise strange bedfellows.
More often, the largest party in a coalition must rely on smaller, sometimes radical parties that can provide the numbers they need in order to take over the Treasury benches. Some of these coalition partners bring nothing more to the table than that one thing (a confidence and supply agreement) that ensures the survival of the administration we elect.
Unfortunately, that link is so tenuous that the coalition or the leadership within this irrational alliance often collapses before its time is up.
However, this next time appears to have the capacity to be different — at least in providing voters with credible options that could work.
Mainly because the current opposition parties (ie, those that are likely to achieve the voter support threshold that ensures representation in Parliament) are idealogically aligned regarding most of the topics that register on the list of voter concerns.
And that “across the board” alliance bodes well for the longevity prospects of the next administration. As such, it should provide a more accurate reflection of our multicultural society that was envisaged by the architects of MMP than other coalitions have done.
I offer this observation based on the recent policy announcements of potential “right of centre” coalition partners. It looks to be a good mix — National, Act and New Zealand First.
Bring it on.