The pageant organiser was stated to have been very proud of the winner and that she had "earned her crown". Another organiser, ducking for cover, said there was nothing in the rules about being unmarried. But yet it was promoted that the winner of this event would be sponsored into the Regency International world title competition and who, according to those rules, had to be unmarried. What a fiasco.
The "winner" I am sure would be a wonderful overseas ambassador for New Zealand but not as a "miss NZ". The organisers have done a tremendous disservice to the runner-up who, by all accounts, was particularly good and who I presume is still single.
I am surprised that the winner even entered into this event to which she, as a lawyer must have known, was not eligible. Interestingly, I read that she became interested in law as a past incident got her "really passionate about the injustice that happens to all people".
If she truly believes this, then the honorable thing would be for her to hand over the crown, the winner's sash and any further benefits to the runner-up.
Further, the promoter should ensure that the runner-up be declared the winner and receive all the entitlements this award bestows.
TONY COOPER
Paremata