Mr McCoskrie says he's keen to ban or restrict some more books he deems to be "inappropriate". I wonder what he has lined up?
Where were they when 50 Shades of Grey was released? Apart from it being an insult to literature, it's a rather explicit book, with no age ban attached.
But, I'm not sure what he wants to achieve. Teens have access to all sorts of media material these days and if he thinks that, by reading a book that has "sexually explicit material" and is full of common swear words used by plenty of teens on a daily basis, teens will learn from or emulate that behaviour, he obviously does not hold teens in very high regard.
Family First must be totally naive to the world around it, or the antics going on in the modern day school-yard.
In the end I believe the ban will backfire on the flock at Family First. And what better way to get publicity for a book that most people would never have read than to have it banned.
I disagree with Dr Mathieson's decision to ban it. I don't think any book should be banned. Restrictions are already placed on pornographic magazines, which is fair enough, but novels? No way.