Northern Advocate
  • Northern Advocate home
  • Latest news
  • Business
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Property
  • Video
  • Death notices
  • Classifieds

Subscriptions

  • Herald Premium
  • Viva Premium
  • The Listener
  • BusinessDesk

Sections

  • Latest news
  • On The Up
  • Business
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
  • Rural
    • All Rural
    • Dairy farming
    • Sheep & beef farming
    • Horticulture
    • Animal health
    • Rural business
    • Rural life
    • Rural technology
  • Sport
  • Property
    • All Property
    • Residential property listings

Locations

  • Far North
  • Kaitaia
  • Kaikohe
  • Bay of Islands
  • Whangārei
  • Kaipara
  • Mangawhai
  • Dargaville

Media

  • Video
  • Photo galleries
  • Today's Paper - E-Editions
  • Photo sales
  • Classifieds

Weather

  • Kaitaia
  • Whangārei
  • Dargaville

NZME Network

  • Advertise with NZME
  • OneRoof
  • Driven Car Guide
  • BusinessDesk
  • Newstalk ZB
  • What the Actual
  • Sunlive
  • ZM
  • The Hits
  • Coast
  • Radio Hauraki
  • The Alternative Commentary Collective
  • Gold
  • Flava
  • iHeart Radio
  • Hokonui
  • Radio Wanaka
  • iHeartCountry New Zealand
  • Restaurant Hub
  • NZME Events

SubscribeSign In
Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.
Home / Northern Advocate

Sand mining company ordered to pay $500k in court costs in Pākiri beach case

NZ Herald
6 Nov, 2024 08:06 PM5 mins to read

Subscribe to listen

Access to Herald Premium articles require a Premium subscription. Subscribe now to listen.
Already a subscriber?  Sign in here

Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech.
‌
Save

    Share this article

Trump is heading back to the white house and Unions call for plan to help young people into jobs.

By Farah Hancock of RNZ

A sand mining company has been ordered to pay $500,000 in costs to community groups who fiercely opposed its plans to mine near Pākiri beach north of Auckland.

McCallum Bros was ordered to pay the costs to Manuhiri Kaitiaki Charitable Trust and Pākiri local Damon Clapshaw after losing its Environment Court case in April.

The award appeared to be among the largest ever ordered by the Environment Court. A $412,000 costs order against a Waiheke vineyard in 2022 was thought to be the highest at that time.

McCallum Bros, which has mined offshore from Pākiri previously, was seeking to take up to 2 million cubic metres of sand from the area.

Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.
Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

It has appealed the case to the High Court.

In the meantime, the Environment Court ordered the company to pay $50,000 to Clapshaw and $450,000 to Manuhiri Kaitiaki. Other parties to the case, including Auckland Council, the Department of Conservation, Forest and Bird and several community groups, settled their costs outside of court.

RNZ understands that includes at least $100,000 in additional payments.

Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

Clapshaw chose to fight the company’s mining bid after discovering the company had breached conditions of its previous resource consent by digging deep trenches in the seabed.

The Environment Court found evidence provided by the company about the ecological effects of the mining had been “patchy”, “inconclusive” and even “incorrect” in the past.

It also found the effects on mana whenua could not be mitigated.

Clapshaw described the case as prolonged, complicated and “acrimonious” at times.

He sought $96,000 in costs he incurred hiring experts to analyse information, and nothing to cover his own time.

The court awarded him $50,000, which he said he was content with.

“In terms of the overall return, if I looked at the investment of both time and energy and resources and opportunity loss, it’s about a fraction, but it’s something I would do again.”

The other amount, awarded to Manuhiri Kaitiaki Charitable Trust, consisted of $100,000 for costs related to expert witnesses, and a further $350,000 to cover other costs.

Part of the cost related to a last-minute attempt by McCallum Bros to have the trust struck out of the case on the basis it was a trade competitor.

The court called the attempt a “concerning aspect” of the case, as the matter had been covered many weeks earlier. The application was “without merit” and should not have been made in the final days of the case, the court found.

Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

Manuhiri Kaitiaki Charitable Trust received 57% of the $795,000 in costs it applied for and Clapshaw 52%. Environment law firms cite 25 to 33% of actual costs as more typical.

The court’s cost decision noted McCallum Bros called the sum sought by Manuhiri Kaitiaki Charitable Trust “unprecedented” if awarded by the court.

However, the court decision said what stood out in the case was the late attempt to remove the trust from the case.

McCallum Bros chief executive Shayne Elstob did not want to comment on the cost decision, but has talked previously about the court process in the select committee hearings for the Fast-track Approvals Bill.

The company’s attempt to gain consent to carry on mining had been a “horrendous” process, Elstob said.

“When all is said and done, this process could take more than seven years and has come at a huge cost to the business,” Elstob told the committee.

Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

“Had we known what we would have been dealing with through the current Resource Management Act process, I’m really not sure whether we would have made the application in the first place. We would have possibly invested our money elsewhere.”

Until the company’s appeal to the High Court is resolved it is operating under a temporary consent with the agreement of parties involved in the case.

Clapshaw said there have been breaches of the temporary arrangement, with more trawls taking place than were allowed. The company had admitted this and put the error down to an incorrect spreadsheet, he said.

In a letter RNZ has seen, a McCallum Bros staff member told Auckland Council the error was because of an incorrectly set-up spreadsheet.

“That does speak volumes to competence, because for most people counting something eight times in a 30-day period is not really requiring the work of an Excel spreadsheet.”

The company also applied for the consent to be included in the proposed fast-track legislation, which could allow projects rejected by courts to proceed.

Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

The expert advisory group recommended it be included, but it did not make the final list of 149 projects selected by Cabinet.

Another McCallum Bros project, seeking to mine up to 8 million cubic metres of sand from Bream Bay, further up the coast from Pākiri, has been green-lit for fast-track consideration.

Sign up to The Daily H, a free newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Save

    Share this article

Latest from Northern Advocate

Northern Advocate

Stunning art on show at Whangārei's Sculpture Northland this weekend

09 May 01:27 AM
Northern Advocate

Northland ovarian cancer patient pens song to help raise awareness

09 May 12:00 AM
Northern Advocate

Sweet success: Northland gelato chain's national expansion

08 May 05:00 PM

One tiny baby’s fight to survive

sponsored
Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

Latest from Northern Advocate

Stunning art on show at Whangārei's Sculpture Northland this weekend

Stunning art on show at Whangārei's Sculpture Northland this weekend

09 May 01:27 AM

Sculpture Northland brings 45 artists and 125 works to Whangārei Quarry Gardens.

Northland ovarian cancer patient pens song to help raise awareness

Northland ovarian cancer patient pens song to help raise awareness

09 May 12:00 AM
Sweet success: Northland gelato chain's national expansion

Sweet success: Northland gelato chain's national expansion

08 May 05:00 PM
Social media a 'lethal' tool in young people's hands, principal says

Social media a 'lethal' tool in young people's hands, principal says

08 May 05:00 PM
Connected workers are safer workers 
sponsored

Connected workers are safer workers 

NZ Herald
  • About NZ Herald
  • Meet the journalists
  • Newsletters
  • Classifieds
  • Help & support
  • Contact us
  • House rules
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Competition terms & conditions
  • Our use of AI
Subscriber Services
  • The Northern Advocate e-edition
  • Manage your print subscription
  • Manage your digital subscription
  • Subscribe to Herald Premium
  • Subscribe to the Northern Advocate
  • Gift a subscription
  • Subscriber FAQs
  • Subscription terms & conditions
  • Promotions and subscriber benefits
NZME Network
  • The Northern Advocate
  • The New Zealand Herald
  • The Northland Age
  • Waikato Herald
  • Bay of Plenty Times
  • Rotorua Daily Post
  • Hawke's Bay Today
  • Whanganui Chronicle
  • Viva
  • NZ Listener
  • What the Actual
  • Newstalk ZB
  • BusinessDesk
  • OneRoof
  • Driven CarGuide
  • iHeart Radio
  • Restaurant Hub
NZME
  • About NZME
  • NZME careers
  • Advertise with NZME
  • Digital self-service advertising
  • Book your classified ad
  • Photo sales
  • © Copyright 2025 NZME Publishing Limited
TOP