Asked what his take was on it, Angell was bereft of ideas as to why he was sent off.
"I can't quite understand, within 15 minutes of the game, how I could have done as much wrong to warrant being sent to the stands.
"I'm just voicing an opinion but obviously I'm not allowed to [do that] about the game," he said, adding he was merely questioning the consistency of the ref's decisions.
He said the sending off had robbed the attention from what the players were doing on the field.
"I don't have any issues. I just see what goes on and I want a little bit of consistency on what I consider to be consistency in the refereeing department."
Angell said fouls from both teams were a given in any game and he had no qualms about that.
"It almost seems a card is produced for our team a lot quicker than the opposition."
While they called the game as they saw it, he felt they tended to gift the opposition an advantage.
"We don't want to make a big song and dance out of it ... but it's disappointing because they can ask why can't their coach be there.
"I've not sworn at anyone or effing blown at anyone but raised issues around my observation."