While deciding how to meet the higher resource consent standards the council considered five options that could be built under the council's existing wastewater consents including worm farm treatment, sequential batch reactors, a modified Bardenpho plant, anaerobic digestion; plus a sixth option of forest treatment as proposed by the Hawke's Bay Regional Council, which would have required a new resource consent. The cost to the council of those options ranged from estimates of $7.7million to $11million with increased operating costs between $293,000 and $379,000.
"The investigations and consultation carried out to reach this result have been extremely robust, and the end result, with considerable savings in cost to the ratepayers and the significantly improved quality of the treated effluent going into the rivers, was a great result for the efforts of councillors, staff, and the community as a whole."
The Hawke's Bay Regional Council chief executive Andrew Newman said the district council would need to satisfy it that the design of the floating wetlands proposal would deliver the required standards by the 2014 deadline. "We will be writing to the Central Hawke's Bay District Council to reiterate the requirement for it to meet the required standards of its discharge consent within two years," he said.