A109 Light Utility Helicopter flight with mayor Gisborne City from the air in November 2023.
Opinion
In his comment on my recent column “Lives or Souls?”, John Fricker says: “Normal, sane people are well able to disagree with one another, remain friends and not feel the need to resort to physical violence to get their way.”
Who could possibly disagree with that? Certainly not I, but
Mr Fricker has difficulty in following his own advice over such a politically neutral topic as “happiness” without resorting to gratuitous, vacuous abuse. Here’s what he had to say about my column of April 1:
“My greatest happiness comes from rubbishing your and Bob Hughes’ left-wing progressive views. You’re both barmy and have no idea of what reality is about. All we ever hear from the pair of you is quotations of what others think laced with questionable references and an extraordinary one-eyed view of everything. Strikes me as strange that the two of you have any sense of happiness at all — couple of doom and gloom merchants I’d say.”
While normal, sane people can disagree about issues such as “happiness” and still remain friends, Mr Fricker cannot keep his temper over what I said about such an emotionally innocuous issue.
But unlike vegetarianism and speed limits, some issues can legitimately raise blood pressure. An example is when religious people try to restrict the freedom of non-believers in the case of the End of Life Choice bill.
