As a farmer, helping to produce the revenue that keeps the country from going bankrupt, l reckon it is only fair that we are able to air our concerns about these spending priorities — particularly when, during the latest climate disaster, through no fault of our own, we ceased to be able to operate in a way that enables the government to allocate those hard-earned funds to the people most likely to vote for them.
Cynical, perhaps, but unfortunately true.
As one living and working at the epicentre of the latest storm, and all the others that have devastated this region at different times over the past 40 years, l know what happens to the local economy and, as a direct result, to the national economy when disasters of this type occur.
Every day that goes by when we can’t produce goods for sale in the markets that will keep our economy in a viable state is one more day that our national debt increases, until we get to a point that it is unsustainable.
Some experts are suggesting we are getting as close to that point as we have ever been and it is time for governments (of whatever persuasion) to rein in the spending — particularly the stuff that is clearly politically motivated.
It is all very well to say that all governments do it — it is the nature of politics.
Well, given that there must come a time when we simply can’t afford to allow this “three yearly lolly scramble” to continue, perhaps we can expect our political masters to start behaving as if they had the nation’s best interests at heart.
Pigs can fly!