Whether the system has improved across those broad parameters - less costs, lower fees, greater efficiency - is moot but the rules have certainly changed substantially over that time.
Ominously, the Abbott press release notes that the previous two systemic inquiries "led to major reforms", implying version 3.0 is likely to do the same.
The terms of reference call for the inquiry to eventually come up with policy options in five areas (or more, if the catch-all "other matters" category is fully acted on), mostly aimed at the financial industry itself.
But there is a further consumer-oriented clause, asking the inquiry to produce policy ideas that "support individuals and businesses to be reasonably able to manage their finances by understanding risks and rewards in the financial sector".
Meanwhile, the regulator responsible for carrying out some of those duties, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), is itself facing a government inquiry sparked by a perceived failure to sort out another financial planning scandal (this time originating from Murray's old haunt, the Commonwealth Bank of Australia).
Both inquiries are likely to spew forth recommendations, some of which, given New Zealand's inextricable links with Australia's financial system, will inevitably spill over to our shores.