Engineer cleared after Air NZ engine incident

The 747 engine again struck trouble on approach to Auckland. Photo / File / Wayne Drought
The 747 engine again struck trouble on approach to Auckland. Photo / File / Wayne Drought

There was nothing to suggest the actions of an engineer who checked the engine of an Air New Zealand 747 after it caught fire as it approached San Francisco were inappropriate, an investigation has found.

The Air New Zealand Boeing 747-419, was on approach to land at San Francisco on September 16, 2011 when the crew was alerted by the crew of another aircraft that flames were coming from the No 4 engine.

There was no indication on the Air New Zealand flight deck of the fire, the Transport Accident Investigation Commission (TAIC) said in its report today.

After an uneventful landing and shutdown, a local engineer inspected the engine and carried out some checks before releasing the aeroplane back to service.

The aeroplane completed a further two sectors without incident but on the next, on approach to Auckland, the No 4 engine surged and it was shut down.

The plane landed safely on three engines.

The cause of the surge at Auckland was not identified and it could not be determined whether the San Francisco fire contributed to the more severe occurrence at Auckland.

"The actions of the San Francisco engineer in following the prescribed maintenance procedures, and completing some additional checks before releasing the aeroplane back to service, were considered appropriate," the TAIC said.

"Engine compressor stalls and surges can be dramatic, especially for passengers. However, a review by Rolls-Royce of reported RB211 engine surge events showed that while a stall could result in damage or having to shut down the engine, the safe operation of the aeroplane should not be affected. In both incidents the crews acted correctly in dealing with the surges."

The TAIC said it became aware of another two recent engine failure/shutdown occurrences in Air New Zealand's fleet.

Although they involved different aeroplane types, each, like the Boeing 747, had been scheduled for replacement in the short to medium future.

The inquiry found no link between the three engine occurrences and nothing to suggest that the operator was accepting lower engineering or safety standards as the three aeroplane types neared replacement.


Get the news delivered straight to your inbox

Receive the day’s news, sport and entertainment in our daily email newsletter


© Copyright 2017, NZME. Publishing Limited

Assembled by: (static) on production apcf04 at 28 May 2017 18:14:41 Processing Time: 534ms