"It is a hypothesis but it could explain why Rewa killed her when he didn't kill his other victims," Mr Burdett said.
Rewa was convicted of solo sex attacks on 24 other women.
The semen in Ms Burdett's body was identified as Rewa's in 1996, but by then 17-year-old Pora had been convicted of her rape and murder. Those convictions were quashed but Pora was convicted again in 2000.
Rewa was eventually convicted of raping Ms Burdett but two juries could not reach a decision on the murder charge.
Meanwhile, the police have refused an Official Information Act request by the Herald to provide details about payments made to witnesses against Pora.
Police said they would not divulge the information because it might affect a future court case.
In his first trial, Pora was convicted on his own confessions, in the second trial on the confessions plus witnesses which Pora's team believe were paid by the police.
One of those believed to have been paid for testimony a jailhouse witness who claimed Pora had confessed died 10 years ago.
Pora's lawyer, Jonathan Krebs, is about to file evidence in support of an application for the royal prerogative of mercy, under which the Governor-General can refer the case back to court.
In recent months the Herald has revealed that:
The world expert in false confessions believes Pora's confession is untrue.
The police criminal profiler whose evidence resulted in Rewa's conviction for 24 sex attacks is convinced Pora was not involved.
The case features on TV3's 60 Minutes tomorrow at 7.30pm.