Whanganui Chronicle
  • Whanganui Chronicle home
  • Latest news
  • Sport
  • Business
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
  • Property
  • Death notices
  • Classifieds

Subscriptions

  • Herald Premium
  • Viva Premium
  • The Listener
  • BusinessDesk

Sections

  • Latest news
  • On The Up
  • Sport
  • Business
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
  • Property
    • All Property
    • Residential property listings
  • Rural
    • All Rural
    • Dairy farming
    • Sheep & beef farming
    • Horticulture
    • Animal health
    • Rural business
    • Rural life
    • Rural technology

Locations

  • Taranaki
  • National Park
  • Whakapapa
  • Ohakune
  • Raetihi
  • Taihape
  • Marton
  • Feilding
  • Palmerston North

Media

  • Video
  • Photo galleries
  • Today's Paper - E-Editions
  • Photo sales
  • Classifieds

Weather

  • New Plymouth
  • Whanganui
  • Palmertson North
  • Levin

NZME Network

  • Advertise with NZME
  • OneRoof
  • Driven Car Guide
  • BusinessDesk
  • Newstalk ZB
  • Sunlive
  • ZM
  • The Hits
  • Coast
  • Radio Hauraki
  • The Alternative Commentary Collective
  • Gold
  • Flava
  • iHeart Radio
  • Hokonui
  • Radio Wanaka
  • iHeartCountry New Zealand
  • Restaurant Hub
  • NZME Events

SubscribeSign In
Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.
Home / Whanganui Chronicle

Opinion: Mixed messages muffle mask mandate

Paul Brooks
By Paul Brooks
Whanganui Midweek·
12 Oct, 2021 03:30 PM5 mins to read

Subscribe to listen

Access to Herald Premium articles require a Premium subscription. Subscribe now to listen.
Already a subscriber?  Sign in here

Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech.
‌
Save

    Share this article

OPINION

Mixed messages are not helping anyone in this Covid-10 pandemic. This is a time when we all need to be on the same page, sensitivities need to be shelved and people pull together for the common good. Instead, we persist with the liberal ideal of individual liberty overriding the needs of the vulnerable and the hope of getting through this mess with our society more or less intact.
So it does not help when the Government website to do with Covid-19 requirements says the following:

"Some people who have a disability or health condition may not be able to wear a face covering safely or comfortably, and so are not required to wear one. These people can get an exemption card but are not required to carry it or show it. (The italics are mine).

Businesses and services do not need to stop people without face coverings from entering their premises or boarding their transport service, because some people will be exempt from wearing a face covering.

Businesses may wish to require face coverings at their premise. They need to take care when doing so, to ensure they do not discriminate against people with disabilities that prevent them from wearing a face mask."

Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.
Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

This is where we get a little too careful and unwilling to offend, and staff and customers' safety becomes secondary to the possibility of someone's personal embarrassment.

Here's the dilemma: you can apply for a mask exemption, and get it approved, and be issued with an exemption certificate or card, but not be required to show it. So why apply at all?

If you are not particularly honest and if you don't have to prove you have an exemption, why bother applying for one? After all, no one's allowed to question it because, apparently, that amounts to discrimination.

Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

And yet the person with the exemption has already admitted to some bureaucrat, during the application process, that they have a condition that precludes them from wearing a face mask.

Was that application inviting discrimination or is that bureaucrat exempt from feeling or expressing discrimination towards others?

Does he or she not have an opinion, make a judgment, feel something? Is he or she the only person dealing with the exemption application? Probably not, so an opinion on the matter has already been formed by more than one feeling, judgmental, normal person.

Also on that website is this:

"If people refuse to wear a face covering, businesses are not required to take any further action to make them. You should ensure your workers have adequate support, instruction and information, including knowing what to do if things escalate."

That puts a lot of onus on the workplace and its staff, and if that place admits the public to its premises, and members of the public refuse to comply with Covid-19 conditions, as happens frequently, who has to train the staff and management in behavioural de-escalation procedures?

As it is, retailers and their untrained staff have to comply with the regulations but aren't allowed to insist members of the public do the same.

That still doesn't stop customers getting angry, abusive and physically intimidating. A checkout operator at a local supermarket says they have been spat upon by people who refuse to comply.

Not because they've been told to do something they don't want to do — heaven forbid anyone should impinge on their individual freedom — but because they're angry in general and need a stationary target.

Supermarket staff are now so accustomed to personal attacks that not many react to it, meaning people can indulge in such cowardly behaviour and suffer few consequences, if any.

Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

Where is the support for all the people who are doing the right thing?
Why are the rules different for everyone and who is supposed to know what rules apply to whom?

Masks are mandatory ... unless you have an exemption, which you are not required to prove, therefore masks are not mandatory, they are optional.

Social distancing is encouraged, but not compulsory, because if you object vehemently to being told to keep your distance, who is trained to deal with the situation? Retailers can't afford to hire security staff to take charge of abusive customers, so who protects them?

In a pandemic, there should be fixed rules in place to protect everyone from possible infection. This is the Delta variant, for goodness sake, with a high rate of contagion and serious symptoms.

The common good is a real thing and forms the basis of most of our laws. For individual sensitivities and civil liberties to supersede the common good, especially in a time like this, says selfishness, or the perceived need of the sensitive individual, is far more important and acceptable than the need for public safety.

If someone has a mask exemption they should be required to show it, so the people they are dealing with understand and social distance accordingly. That's only fair to all those who comply with the "rules". It will also prevent a lot of ill feeling and antagonism in the marketplace.

Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

Either we are that famous team of 5 million looking out for each other, or we are not a team, just 5 million people looking out for themselves. What is it going to be?

Save

    Share this article

Latest from Whanganui Chronicle

Whanganui Chronicle

RSA 'alive and well' despite premises closure

11 Jul 06:00 PM
Whanganui Chronicle

‘Everyone went silent’: Whanganui Youth MP speaks in Parliament

11 Jul 05:00 PM
Opinion

Shelley Loader: How we can all get a share of the apples

11 Jul 05:00 PM

From early mornings to easy living

sponsored
Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

Latest from Whanganui Chronicle

RSA 'alive and well' despite premises closure

RSA 'alive and well' despite premises closure

11 Jul 06:00 PM

Former members are 'more than welcome' to return, RSA Welfare Trust president says.

‘Everyone went silent’: Whanganui Youth MP speaks in Parliament

‘Everyone went silent’: Whanganui Youth MP speaks in Parliament

11 Jul 05:00 PM
Major Joanna Margaret Paul exhibition opens

Major Joanna Margaret Paul exhibition opens

11 Jul 05:00 PM
Shelley Loader: How we can all get a share of the apples

Shelley Loader: How we can all get a share of the apples

11 Jul 05:00 PM
Solar bat monitors uncover secrets of Auckland’s night sky
sponsored

Solar bat monitors uncover secrets of Auckland’s night sky

NZ Herald
  • About NZ Herald
  • Meet the journalists
  • Newsletters
  • Classifieds
  • Help & support
  • Contact us
  • House rules
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Competition terms & conditions
  • Our use of AI
Subscriber Services
  • Whanganui Chronicle e-edition
  • Manage your print subscription
  • Manage your digital subscription
  • Subscribe to Herald Premium
  • Subscribe to the Whanganui Chronicle
  • Gift a subscription
  • Subscriber FAQs
  • Subscription terms & conditions
  • Promotions and subscriber benefits
NZME Network
  • Whanganui Chronicle
  • The New Zealand Herald
  • The Northland Age
  • The Northern Advocate
  • Waikato Herald
  • Bay of Plenty Times
  • Rotorua Daily Post
  • Hawke's Bay Today
  • Viva
  • NZ Listener
  • Newstalk ZB
  • BusinessDesk
  • OneRoof
  • Driven Car Guide
  • iHeart Radio
  • Restaurant Hub
NZME
  • NZME Events
  • About NZME
  • NZME careers
  • Advertise with NZME
  • Digital self-service advertising
  • Book your classified ad
  • Photo sales
  • © Copyright 2025 NZME Publishing Limited
TOP