These issues ignore the real issue, which is whether gambling should be used as such a major funding mechanism, the same issues as whether the tobacco should ever have funded sports and recreation. Ditto the liquor industry.
It's hypocrisy of an abject nature, if one were to accept that these three beneficent sources were all evils, or vices, and is born of eras past where Parliamentarians could not see their way to funding recreational activities of any sort.
It was late in the 1940s that our Parliamentarians also came to realise that most people seemed to like to gamble, albeit to varying degrees, and it was pointless having laws which outlawed the activities of normally law-abiding organisations as they went about raising funds for philanthropic or sporting purposes.
The horse, therefore, bolted one enormously long time ago, and unless governments address issues of how sports and recreation are funded, particularly at grassroots levels, changes to gaming legislation will forever be guided by whether the proceeds are adequate to cover the recreational and social needs that Government resources and other funding mechanisms do not.