As the majority of us (I presume) are decent, law-abiding citizens, we did it even though many of us could probably not afford it and the subsidy we got from the Regional Council (mine is in the post/online banking version apparently) is not that great (about $700).
When I was first confronted with the realisation that I would have to change my sturdy, dependable, heat-giving woodburner, I was a little bemused, but I soon got over it and worked out a plan to get it replaced. The new one, by the way, is fantastic and heats the downstairs beautifully. But that is not the point.
It really irks that us city folk have to go to huge expense to fix what was not broken, when our country neighbours appear to haveslightly less onerous requirements to stop pollution of the environment. It takes me back to the frequent texts and letters we got during the drought a couple of summers ago. With tough water restrictions in Hastings District, many of our readers were maddened by the sight of big sprinkler systems watering farmlands for days on end. It did not seem just.
So, to the councils out there who control our lives, it is not the rules we have a problem with, it is having two sets of them that make us slightly annoyed.