Chances are, unless the offence is considered serious enough to push the case into the District Court jurisdiction, these three will be dealt with in the Youth Court.
For legal reason this means their names will never be publicly disclosed.
All three are jointly charged with aggravated robbery. A very "grown up" offence. One that carries a maximum penalty of 14 years' imprisonment.
The motivation? Cash of course, but for what? Drugs? A new iPod? Stuffed-crust pizza?
Regardless of what the funding was destined for, or whether the firearm allegedly used was real or not, what we should find unconscionable is that these youths considered this an option.
Our judicial system operates on the sacred basis of the presumption of innocence. Which of course should stay sacred.
The problem is, such cases tear at the fabric of this principle. And I don't mean in the judicial sense. I mean we all, once, presumed all children were innocent.