The board recommended not going forward with the business case. DHB chairman Kevin Atkinson supported the recommendation.
"The impact on the local economy and the excellent relationship we have with the local producers would have been jeopardised," he said.
"We have heard from some of the smaller food suppliers that they would have had to close their doors and lay off staff if outsourced food was adopted - I can't support that.
"Anything that has an impact or effect on employment has an effect on health. There were too many negatives and minimal benefits for us to adopt this proposal."
He did not believe the DHB should monitor the implementation of the HBL food services plan in Auckland and southern DHBs, and review their success after six months.
The decision not to go ahead with the business case was carried unanimously, with a round of applause following the motion.
"Hawke's Bay's the fruit bowl of New Zealand, not the frozen food bowl of New Zealand," said board member Ngahiwi Tomoana.
The proposed scheme has proven controversial both locally and nationally. In March, the Service and Food Workers Union (SFWU) presented a petition opposing the scheme to a board meeting, with more than 1000 signatures, mostly from DHB staff.
Meanwhile, about 200 people packed the terraces in Dunedin's Octagon this month to protest the Southern DHB's decision to adopt the scheme, and SFWU has indicated it is considering taking the matter to court.
HBL were asked to attend the meeting via teleconference, but chose not to.