PC6 rules require higher minimum flows in the rivers, exclusion of livestock from waterways, farm environmental management plans with nutrient budgets and comprehensive monitoring of water quality - complementing these rules the dam provides water, not just for flushing flows to remove algal growth but also for managed releases to help maintain in stream minimum flows.
There are consent conditions requiring budgets to encourage biodiversity and riparian plantings, and oversight committees to ensure accountability, compliance and community engagement.
Ms Whaitiri's claim "that the benefits of flushing flows have been disproved" is just not true. The Board of Inquiry heard a significant amount of evidence on flushing flows and concluded that they provide a range of benefits for water quality and ecology.
The Board of Inquiry deserves far better than being accused of being the architect of a "dodgy dam".
I would have thought that rather than trying to kill the project and the new environmental rules (and neither will work without the other), Ms Whaitiri would get behind an initiative which will provide new and sustainable employment for the people she is supposed to represent.
I recall in a former life as Mayor of Napier that local MPs like Geoff Braybrooke and Parakura Horomia willingly assisted local councils to get their important projects done.
- Alan Dick is a Hawke's Bay regional councillor and former mayor of Napier.
- Views expressed here are the writer's opinion and not the newspaper's. Email: editor@hbtoday.co.nz