Respond to on a shift-by-shift basis? Does that mean there has been no formal planning around this dire situation which has existed for a considerable time now?
Responding on a “shift-by-shift-basis” is so unhelpful to the problem and further engenders a stressful situation, where nurses are being asked to work double shifts, come to work while unfit, etc.
In pledging support for nurses, Jim Green is again just offering platitudes.
How ridiculous to be in a situation where bed numbers on the ward might have to be reduced, to take pressure off staff.
The only factor that will help now and over the holidays is the emergency hiring of qualified staff, whether previously mandated out or not.
We know that they are out there. Even such hiring on interim contracts would help, leaving the overall issues to be ironed out at a later date when the pressure has come off a little — if it ever does.
The fact that this article has even surfaced is welcome, but given that the hospital is considering reducing beds on the ward as the only immediate action, the paper needs to ask both the NZNO and Jim Green about their policies on “re-hiring”.
I think it is about time the public were made privy to the “full story” — after all, if bed numbers are reduced, the only result of that will be that members of the public who should be in hospital will be asked to suffer at home instead.