Western Bay of Plenty could have fewer community boards that represent all areas of the region. Photo / Mead Norton
Western Bay of Plenty could have fewer community boards that represent all areas of the region. Photo / Mead Norton
Western Bay community boards have hit back at a proposal to merge, with one saying it would be “eroding a democracy”.
At an appeal hearing on Thursday , four of the region’s five community boards spoke against the proposed changes because it would diminish their local voice.
Yet the WesternBay of Plenty District Council claims it would create fairer representation for everyone.
Western Bay currently has five community boards, each with four members and two councillors, representing Waihī Beach, Katikati, Ōmokoroa, Te Puke and Maketū.
That means areas like Whakamārama, Pukehina, Pongakawa and Paengaroa – which have no board at present – would be better represented. Matakana and Rangiwaea Islands would not be part of a board.
The proposal is part of the council’s representation review that seeks to best represent the region’s 62,000 residents.
Representation reviews set the number of councillors, the number of wards and their boundaries, and the make-up of community boards for an area. They must be done every six years.
Commissioners Brendan Duffy, Bonita Bigham and Gwen Bull heard from 10 submitters about the proposal, all but one of whom opposed changing the number of community boards.
Mayor James Denyer said the proposal provided effective representation for everyone. Photo / Brydie Thompson
Western Bay Mayor James Denyer and Deputy Mayor John Scrimgeour responded to issues raised by submitters during the four-hour hearing.
Denyer said the current community board arrangement did not work well and about 40% of the district was not represented by a board.
He said the Matakana and Rangiwaea Island communities’ desire was “direct engagement” with council for their population of around 250 people.
“The final proposal provides an equitable outcome that improves fair and effective representation.”
Scrimgeour said having only three boards would also reduce the rates people paid to $17.25 per property in the district.
At present, properties in a community board area paid a targeted rate which varied from $23.41 to $184.64.
Waihī Beach Community Board chair Dani Simpson said community boards were the “pulse of our place”.
“We believe that when you diminish our voice, you’re not just redrawing boundaries on a map, that’s severing decades of trust with the council, with our identity, and the wisdom that comes from knowing a community like the back of your hand. It’s a decision that isn’t about efficiency, but it is eroding a democracy.”
The coastal town of Waihī Beach (above) and its inland neighbour Katikati have different challenges, the meeting was told. Photo / NZME
The proposal treated Waihī Beach and Katikati as “interchangeable cells”, but the areas had different challenges and infrastructure needs.
“We are looking to merge a coastal haven with an inland horticulture hub.”
Several submitters said the bigger boards could mean the different communities would compete for funding.
Te Puke Community Board deputy chair Dale Snell said the board was “approachable and trusted” and the small area they covered led to its success.
“We are a passionate community board, and this is how we achieve the big and the small things.”
The new proposal would see them “competing for resources” and “water down the passion and the drive” that enabled the community and the board to thrive.
The Maketū and Katikati Community Board chairs shared similar concerns.
Michael Jones was a Western Bay councillor from 1998-2010. Photo / Stuart Whitaker
Former Western Bay councillor Michael Jones said small communities depended on each other and would have a larger influence if they combined.
“I’m personally for uniting people, bringing them together, not dividing us up into small little groups.”
