It also suggested central government developed an intergenerational fund for climate change.
Tauranga City Council commission chairwoman Anne Tolley said the recommendations on GST and the Government paying councils rates would be a “significant step in the right direction”.
“There’s absolutely no doubt that the largely rates-based funding model does not work in fast-growth centres like Tauranga.
“In a wider infrastructure funding sense, we also need greater alignment between councils and government funding agencies to ensure that investment is available in the right timeframe for priority projects which will generate housing and economic benefits.”
Panel chairman Jim Palmer said they would not comment on specific councils’ circumstances but agreed: “Additional funding alone will not address all the issues facing local government.
“The report identifies several opportunities to strengthen local democracy.
“We highlight the importance of lifting the capability of elected members and the executive staff as well.
“Increased investment is required to support and ensure elected members have the necessary skills and abilities to lead in challenging times and bring an intergenerational focus to decision-making.
“We also believe that there needs to be more diversity in the makeup of councils helping ensure a broad range of perspectives are brought to the issues and opportunities facing local government.
Touted as the most significant review of local government since the 1989 reforms and the 2002 Local Government Act, it also suggested “reorganisation”.
This would mean amalgamating councils at the regional level with two models suggested by the panel. The unitary model would include a regional council and local councils across an agreed sub-region.
A regional combined authority would have the councils remain, sharing functions and services.
When asked for her thoughts on a unitary model that would have Tauranga City, Western Bay of Plenty and the Bay of Plenty Regional Council combined, Tolley replied: “A Western Bay unitary council model could offer some advantages and would eliminate confusion about which councils provide which services in which areas.
“This is not something that has been formally discussed, however, and would need to be considered at an inter-council level if the Government is keen to pursue this approach.
“Any changes would need to be on a case-by-case basis, with willing parties and with the full involvement of the communities concerned.”
The recommendations also included a four-year electoral term and lowering the voting age to 16 for local government.
Also lowering the threshold for the establishment of Māori wards and enabling Te Tiriti-based appointments to councils. As well as a statutory requirement for councils to develop partnership frameworks with hapū/iwi and Māori.
Palmer said: “Advancing the recommendations is critical to making sure local government can deliver the services and infrastructure needed for healthy, thriving and resilient communities for years to come.”
But action on the report won’t happen before this year’s general election.
Local Government Minister Kieran McAnulty told Local Democracy Reporting the independent report requested by the sector was an opportunity to work with local government and consider the issues raised, after the upcoming election.
“The recommendations are not government policy but will provide an opportunity to work with local government to agree on what changes need to be made to make it fit for purpose for 30 to 50 years,” he said.
Panel member Brendan Boyle said the recommendations were “changes that are needed for the future, irrespective of whom is in government today or tomorrow”.
— Public Interest Journalism funded through NZ on Air
