Postings made by Diocesan students were printed out and handed to the school. Photo / BOP Times

Postings made by Diocesan students were printed out and handed to the school. Photo / BOP Times

One of New Zealand's top private schools stood down four students for making derogatory comments on Facebook about a teacher and a student.

The case has sparked debate about the rights of schools to take action over private comments between individuals out of school time.

Diocesan School for Girls principal Heather McRae would not give the exact number of year 10 students involved, but a well-placed source told Herald on Sunday four girls were stood down and others given detention following two incidents.

The first incident arose in early May, when several 15 and 16-year-olds were chatting on their Facebook sites about another girl.

The source said the friends made comments like, "Oh, that so-and-so took such-and-such's boyfriend. She's such a bitch".

The second incident, in the past fortnight, involved a group of separate girls making derogatory comments about a teacher on Facebook. The source said the teacher was called a "bitch" and "lesbian".

The postings were printed out by a third party and handed to school heads.

"I understand the school was initially concerned that the girls chatting on Facebook were [involved in] internet bullying, but it turned out they weren't," the source said.

"It was just them chatting amongst themselves and they hadn't mentioned any names but they were making bitchy, nasty comments.

"The issue is, does the school have the right to stand down girls for comments made on Facebook in their own time, on their own computers, in what is supposedly a private forum?"

McRae conceded it was "a bit of a grey area" and "it will become more so for the coming years", but the school had a "huge responsibility" to educate girls on acceptable communication.

Asked where the school drew the line between privacy and parental and school issues, McRae said: "For me, where a student at the school is implied and abused, and where a teacher is implied, and abused, and named then I certainly feel a moral and ethical responsibility to follow up with that."

Diocesan should have passed concerns to parents and let them deal with it, the source believed.

"Should the school be snooping? I don't think the school has a right to go into someone's private life and say, 'Oh, we don't like what you were saying in private therefore we're going to stand you down from school'."